Fear of the Evil Eye

Amulets against the evil eye have been excavated from around five thousand years ago. What the belief holds is that a hostile look, envy behind it more often than not, can bring harm or bad luck on whoever it lands on. It is held around the Mediterranean and through the Balkans and Eastern Europe, across West, Central and South Asia, in Africa, and through the Caribbean and Latin America.

Where it is not found is the more interesting half. Look for it in the older folklore of Asia, of Sub-Saharan Africa or of Native America and it is not there. A belief that looks universal turns out to have a map, and the map follows the Indo-European, Mediterranean and West Asian world outward from a probable origin in Sumeria.

Which English word the evil eye left behind

Fascinus, or fascinum, comes from the Latin fascinare, meaning to cast a spell, and it is where fascinate comes from. The object it named was a phallic charm used against the evil eye, found across Europe and into the Middle East in contexts from the first century BC to the fourth century AD.

The charms were worn as pendants and rings and also carved into buildings, set into mosaics and hung as wind chimes. One carving at Leptis Magna has a severed phallus going on the offensive against an eye and ejaculating at it. Ralph Merrifield's phrase for the Roman charm is a lightning conductor for good luck, and it is the most exact account available of how such an object was thought to function. It does not block anything. It earths it.

What Plutarch and Pliny said about the evil eye

Peter Walcot's Envy and the Greeks, published in 1978, listed more than a hundred works mentioning the evil eye. The names on it include Hesiod and Callimachus, Plato and Theocritus, Diodorus Siculus and Heliodorus, Plutarch, Pliny the Elder and Aulus Gellius. Their term for it was ophthalmos baskanos.

Plutarch gave it a chapter in his Symposium and attempted a mechanism: the eyes were the chief if not the only source of deadly rays, which sprang up like poisoned darts from the inner recesses of a person possessing the eye. He also treated the phenomenon as seemingly inexplicable, a source of wonder and a cause of disbelief, which is a more sceptical position than the mechanism suggests.

Pliny the Elder described certain African enchanters as having the power of fascination with the eyes and being able to kill those they fixed their gaze on. Virgil put the belief in a shepherd's mouth: Menalcas, lamenting his sick animals, asks what eye it is that has fascinated his tender lambs.

Belief was uneven across the Roman Empire, and in some places whole tribes were held to transmit it, those of Pontus and Scythia particularly.

What people did about it

The Greek protective vocabulary alone runs to six words: apotropaia, probaskania, periammata, periapta, profylaktika and phylaktiria. Talismans went in houses, amulets on people, charms on animals. Peisistratus put a grasshopper figure up in front of the Acropolis.

The methods that are not objects are the ones worth recording. Greeks and Romans spat into the folds of their clothes. Ancient Greeks dressed boys as girls to avert the eye, which is protection by misdirection rather than by deflection. In Arab culture the phrase Masha'Allah, God has willed it, said alongside a compliment prevents the compliment attracting the eye, which locates the danger in the praise rather than in the praiser. In Palestine and Iran, certain plants including rue are held to protect.

The Illyrians used objects shaped as a phallus, a hand, a leg and animal teeth.

How the nazar bends a malicious gaze back

The best-known talismans work by reflection. The nazar, a disc or bead of concentric blue and white circles, is itself a representation of an eye, and in some versions of the folklore the staring eyes bend the malicious gaze back toward the sorcerer.

Glass beads produced in the Mediterranean from around 1500 BC popularised the form among Indians, Phoenicians, Persians, Arabs, Greeks, Romans and Ottomans. The hamsa, from the word for five, is the hand-shaped amulet, called the Hand of Mary in Levantine Christian culture and the Hand of Fatima in some Muslim and Balkan ones, and condemned as superstition by doctrinaire Muslims. In the Italian south the objects are the cornicello and the cimaruta, and the gesture is the sign of the horns.

Kilim rugs weave the same protections into pattern:

  • a cross to divide the eye into four
  • a hook to destroy it
  • a human eye to avert the gaze
  • the triangular shape of an amulet containing a sacred verse

What is not evidence

Two corrections belong here. The Eye of Horus does comparable work in Egyptian usage, standing for protection, health and good fortune, and it is not aimed at a hostile look in particular. And the Eye-Idols excavated at the Tell Brak Eye Temple, dating from about 8700 to 3500 BC, are believed by the Metropolitan Museum of Art to have been figurines offered to gods and to be unrelated to any belief in the evil eye.

Alabaster idols with incised eyes were found at Tell Brak, and texts from Ugarit, a port city that existed until about 1180 BC, do attest the concept. The distinction between an eye depicted and an eye feared is one the archaeology has had to make repeatedly.

Told apart

Often confused with Fear of the Evil Eye

Common questions

Questions about Fear of the Evil Eye

Does the word fascinate come from this?
Yes. Fascinus or fascinum was the Roman phallic charm used against the evil eye, from the Latin fascinare, to cast a spell, which gives the English fascinate. The charms were worn as pendants and rings and carved into buildings, and a stone carving from Leptis Magna shows a disembodied phallus attacking an evil eye by ejaculating toward it.
Is the belief universal?
No, and the map is the interesting part. It runs across the Mediterranean, the Balkans, Eastern Europe, West Asia, Central Asia, South Asia, Africa, the Caribbean and Latin America, probably from an origin in Sumeria. It is not found in the original folklore traditions of Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa or Native America.
How did the classical world explain it?
Plutarch gave it a chapter in his Symposium and proposed that the eyes were the chief source of deadly rays springing up like poisoned darts from the inner recesses of the possessor. He also called the phenomenon seemingly inexplicable and a cause of disbelief, which is more sceptical than his own mechanism. Pliny the Elder described African enchanters able to kill by fixing their gaze.
Why does a compliment need protecting against?
Because envy is the mechanism, so praise is where the danger enters. In Arab culture the phrase Masha'Allah, God has willed it, said alongside a compliment prevents it from attracting the evil eye. That locates the risk in the act of admiration rather than in any malice by the admirer.
What does the nazar bead actually do?
It reflects. The disc of concentric blue and white circles is itself a representation of an eye, and in some versions of the folklore the staring eyes bend the malicious gaze back toward the sorcerer. Glass bead production in the Mediterranean from around 1500 BC spread the form among Indians, Phoenicians, Persians, Arabs, Greeks, Romans and Ottomans.
Are the Tell Brak eye figures evidence of this belief?
The Metropolitan Museum of Art says not. The Eye-Idols excavated at the Tell Brak Eye Temple, dating from about 8700 to 3500 BC, are believed to have been figurines offered to gods and unrelated to the evil eye. Alabaster idols with incised eyes were found at the same site, and texts from Ugarit do attest the concept.

Added 2026-08-23 · Revised 2026-08-26